In many markets, coordinated poor service by multiple providers
results in the short term profit maximizing strategy.
4 weekends. This allows for great Sunday nights will Jill, Edie, and
our new baby Cooper; and I’m an early to bed early to rise kind of guy
so waking at 5am-ish is no issue. However, this requires taking a taxi. All three times the taxis have
been 10 to 15 minutes late. Today I used an earlier than needed pickup
time to ensure I arrived in time for the train. The taxi was 15
minutes late. When I commented on this to the dispatcher and driver, they were
unapologetic claiming the guy before me was late. They went so far as
to say “there’s nothing they could do.” From an operations standpoint the solution is simple: more taxis or
fewer bookings. What they should have said is that the current setup
is more profitable, and that customer dissatisfaction is unlikely to
harm the business. Taxis are not a long lifetime customer value
business. From the three services I’ve used, the industry in East Hampton
appears in coordination to abide by these principles. No one respects
pickup times, so everyone can profit maximize at lower service levels. Such tacit coordinations in fragmented industries would be very
interesting were they not so infuriating. The only risk is that a vicious cycle occurs. More and more people
like me give false early pickup times and on the rare occasion the
taxi arrives at the appointed time, I’m not ready resulting in
backups. Perhaps that was the cause of my delay today. The opportunity here is for a higher service, higher price provider:
East Hampton On-Time Taxi. It could probably charge a 50% premium
justifying fewer bookings. Either way, in frustration there are always learnings and logic.
Things are seldom the way they are because there is “nothing to be
done.” Especially when it comes to being late and poor service, active choice
is almost always at play.






















